Q. Could you please tell me how ‘Gotham’ came to be a reference to
New York City?
Gregory Hefner
A. It’s the fault of Washington Irving. He applied the name to New York in an issue of a humorous magazine name Salmagundi, a title taken from the name of a salad which consists of a variety of
ingredients. The original Gotham is popularly supposed to be the village of that name in Nottinghamshire, though I gather there’s
little good evidence of this. The story is that bad King John (Magna Carta, etc.) decided to visit Gotham on a royal progress, though why he should when he had a perfectly good castle to stay at just up the road at Nottingham is not explained. The villagers
realised this would be inconvenient and expensive because of the size of the king’s retinue. They decided to pretend to be imbecilic in front of the king’s heralds, by trying to fish the
moon out of a pond, running madly in circles, trying to drown an eel, clasping hands around a thorn bush to imprison a cuckoo, and other crazy actions. The ploy worked and the king decided not to
come. A collection of tales about stupidity was published in the reign of Henry VIII, entitled The Merrie Tales of the Mad Men of
Gotham. So the name had by Washington Irving’s time long been associated with stupidity, even though the original story was actually about a kind of twisted cleverness. Washington Irving thought this just the name to give to a city which he believed was
inhabited by fools.
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
Asimov's Corollary to Clarke's First Law:
When, however, the lay public rallies round an idea that is denounced by distinguished but elderly
scientists and supports that idea with great fervor
and emotion—the distinguished but elderly scientists are then, after all, probably right.
But the only way of discovering the limits of the
possible is to venture a little way past them into
the impossible.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.